People familiar with blogs, well- known technique called ' take-away from the comments '. This means writing a new post with the subject affected by the comments to one of the pre-existing positions and, as a rule that differs from the existing post of topics. ' Reach ' is done for two main reasons:.
First, to draw attention to a new topic. A new post has always attracted more attention than a new comment to an existing post.
And, secondly, not to confuse the discussion in one branch of the two ( or more ) are essentially different issues.
Yesterday Sergey Golubev in the comments start a blog topic asked - ' Why are not ' free 'ECM- systems? ' . ' As for the so-called free ECM systems want to note that there are few precisely the same reason for MDM very little free business applications of any orientation. Moreover, referring to the free ECM systems, can not fail to notice that the benefit of their purchase, and seemingly comes from incorrect estimates of TCO methodologies for their implementation. As soon as we begin to properly consider TCO as an example of specific tasks for which the plan primmenyat ECM system, once it becomes clear that the savings in this introduction does not get, and at best can happen pereaspredelenie budgets between provider systems and vendor systems in favor of the first. However, the provider when it is left alone with the client and he has all the liability on that for serious business needs exactly one sane providers are not ready. However, I can say. such that the niche of domestic SED proivoditeley many who are working with a client does not share the amount on the project and the introduction of a license is actually selling free software, but it certainly is clear to everyone that this is again an imitation of ideas. '. It seems to me that the theme of ' free ' ECM- systems will be enough interest to form communities of this blog, so I took it upon myself to make the subject of the comments. In order not to act as a primitive kopipastera, add and myself, '5 cents ':). For Russia, the problem of free business applications is another important aspect - the location of the user interface. It's no secret that the majority of free software comes to us from the West and, consequently, in the ' original packaging ', m. e. with the English interface. And if the system software for the English language interface is not very critical (users of the software - as a rule, IT professionals, who are used to read and write ' not in Russian '), the Russian business users want to see on the screen was all ' in . In the case of commercial software for all the costs of localization assumes the vendor (usually - although there may be options). And who will undertake the localization of free software? . ( c) SC Sukhov. Integrator? . The customer in the project budget? .